Inaugural Conference - June 2002

SHOULD ZOOS BECOME MORE INVOLVED IN WILDLIFE CONSERVATION?
HEALTH RISKS AND OBLIGATIONS

Willem SchaftenaarWillem Schaftenaar, DVM, Head of the veterinary department of Rotterdam Zoo, Van Aerssenlaan 49, 3039 KE Rotterdam, The Netherlands

In the past decades zoos have increased their conservation efforts. With the worldwide decline of biotopes, the question arises whether small captive populations, scattered in numerous zoos all over the world, can play a role in the process to stop the decrease of biodiversity. Captive bred animals have often lost characteristics that are indispensable for their survival in the wild. National parks are more and more managed as large zoos. Wildlife veterinarians and field biologists are “playing God” while trans-locating, radio tracking, culling, vaccinating and even treating sick wild animals.

Managers of wildlife parks have a lot in common with managers of zoos. Denying this statement illustrates the blindness that has existed for many years.
A good understanding of the health implications when keeping non-domestic animals in captivity is needed. The increasing research on species-specific pathogens that is carried out by several zoos has revealed a number of diseases affecting species that do not come into contact with the causative pathogens in their natural habitat. All possible measures should be taken to prevent the transmission of such organisms from their natural hosts, which often show minimum symptoms, to the new and vulnerable “exotic” host.

previous    overview    next

   
Go back
   
This site is maintained by JaDes